Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video77 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennie Cecil Moore results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anchoring Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 161 faulty-reasoning hits from 308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 91% (576 of 6,350 authors). This Jennie Cecil Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Jennie Cecil Moore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
91%Jennie Cecil Moore (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 308
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510090.9% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles308 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 13.0%13.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 9.4%9.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 10.4%10.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 9.4%9.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Recency Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos