Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neighborhood Development results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 716 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,070 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,677 of 16,562 topics). This Neighborhood Development is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Neighborhood Development
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠18%Neighborhood Development (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,070
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos