Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Negligence results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hindsight Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 549 hits . Analysis detected 2,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,818 of 16,559 topics). This Negligence is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Negligence
Topic details
Total words: 2,528
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.9% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.5% 12.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 21.7% 21.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst