Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ncaa Football Oversight Committee results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,111 of 15,400 topics). This Ncaa Football Oversight Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Ncaa Football Oversight Committee
Topic details
Total words: 2,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.0%14.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos