Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nbcuniversal results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 3,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,317 of 16,562 topics). This Nbcuniversal is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Nbcuniversal
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,332
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos