Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nbc results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 626 hits. Analysis detected 3,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,081 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,477 of 16,562 topics). This Nbc is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Nbc
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,081
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos