Topic summary
⁠7%2 analyzed articles/videos1,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naval Disasters results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hindsight Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 289 hits. Analysis detected 2,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,358 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,249 of 16,562 topics). This Naval Disasters is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
Naval Disasters
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,358
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos