Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Nature Documentaries results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 5,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,028 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Nature Documentaries is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nature Documentaries
Topic details
Total words: 5,028
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos