Topic summary
17% 4 analyzed articles/videos 143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natural Gas results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 470 hits . Analysis detected 2,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,267 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,466 of 15,447 topics). This Natural Gas is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Natural Gas
Topic details
Total words: 6,267
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst