Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nato Alliance results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and False Dilemma , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 351 hits . Analysis detected 2,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,930 of 16,562 topics). This Nato Alliance is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Nato Alliance
Topic details
Total words: 1,388
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.3% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 25.3% 25.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 24.1% 24.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Tu Quoque: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst