Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Security Legislation results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 54.3% saturation with 1,215 hits. Analysis detected 4,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,081 of 16,335 topics). This National Security Legislation is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
National Security Legislation
Topic details
Total words: 2,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.3% percentile
7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 54.3%54.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.3%15.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.7%19.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.2%31.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 54.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 31.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos