Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Resilience results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 1,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,420 of 16,562 topics). This National Resilience is worse (more manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
National Resilience
Topic details
Total words: 756
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.4% percentile
9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles756 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.2%17.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.4%20.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.3%5.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos