Topic summary
13% 1 analyzed article/video 313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Regulatory Modernization results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 200 hits . Analysis detected 730 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 63% (6,245 of 16,562 topics). This National Regulatory Modernization is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. National Regulatory Modernization
Topic details
Total words: 1,252
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst