Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Missile Defense results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Burden of Proof, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 529 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,092 of 16,558 topics). This National Missile Defense is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
National Missile Defense
Topic details
Total words: 1,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.8%1.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos