Topic summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Law results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 375 hits . Analysis detected 2,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,202 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,583 of 16,562 topics). This National Law is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. National Law
Topic details
Total words: 2,202
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 17.0% 17.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst