Topic summary
⁠70%5 analyzed articles/videos1,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Guard results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 1,964 hits. Analysis detected 12,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,325 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (9,650 of 15,326 topics). This National Guard is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
National Guard
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.5%12.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos