Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These National Football League results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 1,018 hits. Analysis detected 4,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This National Football League is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
National Football League
Topic details
Total words: 4,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.4%23.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos