Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Economy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 1,642 hits. Analysis detected 6,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,432 of 16,562 topics). This National Economy is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
National Economy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 38.7%38.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.1%15.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 38.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Composition/Division: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos