Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natanz results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 3,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,995 of 16,562 topics). This Natanz is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Natanz
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,632
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.8% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.0%13.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos