Topic summary
59%1 analyzed article/video499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nascar 26 results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,497 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,923 of 16,562 topics). This Nascar 26 is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Nascar 26
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,497
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.0%13.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos