Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video467 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nasa Programs results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 561 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,909 of 16,562 topics). This Nasa Programs is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Nasa Programs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos