Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nasa Artemis Heat Shield Danger results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 994 hits. Analysis detected 4,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,125 of 16,562 topics). This Nasa Artemis Heat Shield Danger is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Nasa Artemis Heat Shield Danger
Topic details
Total words: 4,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos