Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Napa Valley Wine Industry results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 931 hits . Analysis detected 5,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,872 of 16,562 topics). This Napa Valley Wine Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Napa Valley Wine Industry
Topic details
Total words: 3,196
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.6% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 29.1% 29.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 20.4% 20.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst