Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mysterious Deaths results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,154 hits. Analysis detected 7,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,329 of 16,562 topics). This Mysterious Deaths is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Mysterious Deaths
Topic details
Total words: 6,664
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.9%15.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.9%14.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos