Topic summary
⁠38%3 analyzed articles/videos1,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Myanmar results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 690 hits. Analysis detected 8,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,128 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (10,694 of 15,447 topics). This Myanmar is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Myanmar
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,128
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos