Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,922 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Muslims In America results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 889 hits. Analysis detected 5,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,340 of 16,562 topics). This Muslims In America is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Muslims In America
Topic details
Total words: 3,844
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 23.1%23.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 21.4%21.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 18.2%18.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.0%11.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos