Topic summary
⁠85%2 analyzed articles/videos1,572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Museum Security results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 952 hits. Analysis detected 6,335 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,910 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,487 of 15,949 topics). This Museum Security is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Museum Security
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,910
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.1%16.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 16.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos