Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Walker Schulte Schneider results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 906 hits . Analysis detected 5,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,224 of 6,628 authors). This Walker Schulte Schneider is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Walker Schulte Schneider
Author details
Total words: 4,776
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 19.0% 19.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.0%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 18.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst