Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Multiplayer Gaming results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 629 hits. Analysis detected 1,956 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,865 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Multiplayer Gaming is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Multiplayer Gaming
Topic details
Total words: 2,865
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 21.9%21.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.0%10.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos