Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mujeres En El Deporte results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 268 hits. Analysis detected 562 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,430 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,113 of 16,562 topics). This Mujeres En El Deporte is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Mujeres En El Deporte
Topic details
Total words: 1,430
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.7%18.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos