Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mountaineering results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 3,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,160 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (12,985 of 16,244 topics). This Mountaineering is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Mountaineering
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,160
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos