Topic summary
⁠50%3 analyzed articles/videos1,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moscow results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 919 hits. Analysis detected 6,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,585 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,372 of 16,562 topics). This Moscow is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Moscow
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,585
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.0%14.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos