Topic summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moratoriums results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 2,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,989 of 16,562 topics). This Moratoriums is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Moratoriums
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos