Author summary
24% 1 analyzed article/video 968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ajani Stella results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 397 hits . Analysis detected 2,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,438 of 6,560 authors). This Ajani Stella is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Ajani Stella
Author details
Total words: 3,872
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst