Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video1,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moral Judgment results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 585 hits. Analysis detected 2,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,087 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,835 of 16,562 topics). This Moral Judgment is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Moral Judgment
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,087
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos