Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moon Missions results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 1,477 hits. Analysis detected 8,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,237 of 16,562 topics). This Moon Missions is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Moon Missions
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 25.1%25.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 17.3%17.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos