Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monday Night Foodball results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 56.7% saturation with 668 hits. Analysis detected 1,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,179 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,263 of 16,562 topics). This Monday Night Foodball is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Monday Night Foodball
Topic details
Total words: 1,179
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.3% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 56.7%56.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 56.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos