The smoke rises again when K-Tex BBQ returns to Monday Night Foodball 80%

By Mike Sula92%

7/24/2026, 10:06:49 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 65.4% saturation with 257 hits. Analysis detected 789 faulty-reasoning hits from 393 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (4,564 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the article peer group.

The animals were running the streets in crop tops and cargo shorts last February 2. 
The ice dome that covered the city had cracked—up 32 degrees Fahrenheit from the previous week’s gelid 8. 
They’d crawled out of hibernation with their snouts upward, huffing meat smoke out of the sky. 
Maybe they smelled Korean barbecue. 
Or maybe it was central Texas–style, low-and-slow smoked brisket. 
Or maybe it was both. 
By 5 PM a line was snaking around the dining room of an Avondale restaurant. 
The ones who showed up early got what they were hungry for. 
Anyone who crawled in after 7 PM was out of luck. 
The animals had cleaned out the kitchen. 
No guarantees it won’t happen again this Monday, July 27, when K-Tex BBQ returns to Monday Night Foodball, the Reader’s weekly chef pop-up at Thattu. 
But it probably won’t. 
Brothers Sam and Stephen Lee, who grew up smoking fish and game and eating their grandma’s moose meat kalbi in Alaska—and then eating pin oak-smoked brisket in Texas—have had nearly six months to manage their fan army’s expectations. 
They include smoked brisket with perilla leaf chimichurri; spare ribs in gochujang glaze; and pulled pork in a vinegary, soy-pickled jjangachi sauce with a kiss of the Carolinas. 
You can also order their signature one-bite pork belly ssam slider with ssamjang, the fermented soybean and hot pepper dipping sauce. 
To the side: kimchi, white-pickled daikon, or traditional jjangachi—soy-pickled onions and daikon. 
The boys are also introducing pulled pork or pork belly rice bowls with stir-fried kimchi, pickled radish, crushed seaweed, and toasted sesame seeds. 
And once again you can upgrade among a trio of premium sides: sweet wasabi slaw; or kimchi cup-bap, white rice over sauteed kimchi and pickled daikon; or their K-Army baked beans, a riff on budae jjigae, the post-Korean war Spam–hot dog–bean fusion stew that developed from discarded U.S. 
Army rations. 
Finish with mildly sweet banana milk pudding. 
Gonna be a scorcher, but in the air-conditioned oasis at 2601 W. 
Fletcher, it’ll be chill. 
Everyone gets fed starting at 5 PM this Monday, July 27 in Avondale. 
Like always, happy hour goes until 7 PM, with $5 beers and nonalcoholic drinks, and $12 bespoke cocktails by bar manager Melanie Hernandez. 
Meanwhile, check out the full Foodball schedule below: 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Mike Sula: 1.5%Chicago Reader: 0.3%Anchoring Bias4.6%This article: 3.6%Mike Sula: 1.2%Chicago Reader: 2.5%Availability Heuristic3.6%This article: 2.3%Mike Sula: 0.8%Chicago Reader: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic2.3%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.3%Chicago Reader: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 25.2%Mike Sula: 8.4%Chicago Reader: 3.3%Framing Effect25.2%This article: 2.8%Mike Sula: 0.9%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Loss Aversion2.8%This article: 18.6%Mike Sula: 6.2%Chicago Reader: 0.5%Status Quo Bias18.6%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.4%Mike Sula: 2.8%Chicago Reader: 3.0%Optimism Bias7.4%This article: 1.0%Mike Sula: 0.3%Chicago Reader: 0.9%Pessimism Bias1.0%This article: 3.1%Mike Sula: 1.0%Chicago Reader: 4.9%Negativity Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Mike Sula: 3.2%Chicago Reader: 6.9%Halo Effect9.7%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Mike Sula: 1.3%Chicago Reader: 0.5%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.7%Mike Sula: 3.2%Chicago Reader: 1.3%Appeal to Authority9.7%This article: 1.3%Mike Sula: 0.4%Chicago Reader: 1.2%False Dilemma1.3%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.9%Mike Sula: 2.0%Chicago Reader: 4.6%Hasty Generalization5.9%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 10.7%Chicago Reader: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.9%Mike Sula: 3.6%Chicago Reader: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.9%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.9%Mike Sula: 2.6%Chicago Reader: 2.1%Anecdotal7.9%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.3%Mike Sula: 0.4%Chicago Reader: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.3%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 16.5%Mike Sula: 11.1%Chicago Reader: 12.2%Biased Writer Voice16.5%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Sula: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 65.4%Mike Sula: 56.7%Chicago Reader: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…65.4%

393 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.