Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mmorpgs results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 4,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,845 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Mmorpgs is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mmorpgs
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Mmorpgs (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 4,845
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos