Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kallie Plagge results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 4,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,845 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,346 authors). This Kallie Plagge is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Kallie Plagge
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Kallie Plagge (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,845
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 10.2%10.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos