Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kallie Plagge results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 494 hits . Analysis detected 4,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,845 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,346 authors). This Kallie Plagge is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kallie Plagge
Author details
Total words: 4,845
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.2% 10.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst