Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mlb Rules results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 2,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,065 of 16,562 topics). This Mlb Rules is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Mlb Rules
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠28%Mlb Rules (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,632
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.2%12.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos