Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mlb At Field Of Dreams Game results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 1,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (8,584 of 22,803 topics). This Mlb At Field Of Dreams Game is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Mlb At Field Of Dreams Game
Topic details
Total words: 1,848
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos