Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Redistricting results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 618 hits. Analysis detected 4,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,489 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,533 of 16,562 topics). This Missouri Redistricting is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Missouri Redistricting
Topic details
Total words: 5,489
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos