Topic summary
0% 14 analyzed articles/videos 10,971 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Legislature results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 4,491 hits . Analysis detected 32,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,554 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,820 of 15,689 topics). This Missouri Legislature is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group. Missouri Legislature
Topic details
Total words: 44,554
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score14 analyzed articles44.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst