Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Education Policy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 1,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,549 of 16,562 topics). This Missouri Education Policy is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Missouri Education Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos