Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Annelise Hanshaw results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 912 hits . Analysis detected 6,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,260 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,198 of 6,279 authors). This Annelise Hanshaw is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Annelise Hanshaw
Author details
Total words: 7,260
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst