Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Education Funding results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 469 hits. Analysis detected 3,879 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,778 of 16,562 topics). This Missouri Education Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Missouri Education Funding
Topic details
Total words: 2,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 9.2%9.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos