Topic summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miramar results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 345 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,198 of 16,562 topics). This Miramar is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Miramar
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 345
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.8% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles345 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.0%22.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos