Author summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Torres results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 345 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (325 of 6,357 authors). This Andrea Torres is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Andrea Torres
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠95%Andrea Torres (selected)11%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 345
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

95% percentile
025507510094.9% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles345 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.9%9.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 22.0%22.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos