Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Vikings results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 1,167 hits. Analysis detected 6,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,672 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,069 of 16,562 topics). This Minnesota Vikings is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Minnesota Vikings
Topic details
Total words: 3,672
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.9%12.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.8%31.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.3%9.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.5%10.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Special Pleading: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos